PNN - We Cover the Nonprofit World
Philanthropy News Network
Make us your home page!
Front Page
News Summary
Corporate Giving
Education
Foundations
Fundraising
Giving
Innovations
Law, Taxes Money
People
Technology
Volunteers

About PNN
Contact Us
Sponsors
Links

Conferences
Nonprofit Jobs
Online Classes

Free Tech Report
Free Email Alert

Join Us
email us
Dec. 4, 2000
technology

Controversy over the use, regulation of Web filters continues

Parents are worried about the Internet, but not because of access costs or down times. They're worried instead about the threat of online pornography and its easy accessibility.

To counter this, many parents and some schools, libraries and community centers are installing online filtering software, though this action requires confidence the program will do its job.

The companies producing these programs say they block only those Web sites they consider to be obscene, pornographic or otherwise explicit, but generally refuse to disclose which sites are on their blacklists.

This is where the American Civil Liberties Union comes in. The civil rights organization argues that people have a right to know exactly what sites the software blocks, especially if government-funded groups such as schools and public libraries are using the filters.

Anti-censorship activists have proven that some filters block harmless Web sites, such as the American Association of University Women, the New York Times reports.

Many sites related to gay and lesbian political action and health issues have been blocked by filters, as another example.

The ACLU earlier this year defended three Web publishers who posted lists of sites blocked by CyberPatrol, an Internet filter, and linking to a program that circumvented the filters.

The publishers -- The Breaking of Cyber Patrol 4, Peacefire and Waldo.Net -- argue that such lists should be open for public review to see if they reflect possible political, social and/or religious bias.

The Web publishers learned recently that the Library of Congress has determined that new federal regulations protect people who want to read such lists, the Times reports.

SurfControl, the company that sells CyberPatrol products, claims the ruling is essentially moot because the posted hacks don't work on the new version of the software. While the company still won't reveal a list of blocked sites, users can submit specific Web addresses to see if they are included in the filtering program.

The rulings are becoming more relevant in today's political climate. A bill before Congress would deny schools and libraries Internet access funds if they don't use Internet filters, the newspaper reports.

Full text of the article is currently found at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/11/
16/technology/16FILT.html



Mail this article to a friend What do you think?
Reply to this article, click here.

Back to the top
Free e-mail alert
RELEVANT ARTICLES:
Commission says Internet filtering software should be voluntary
Legislation requires Internet filter on school and library computers
Report: E-rate program has wired most of nation's schools
ADL releases hate-speech Internet filter
RELEVANT LINKS:
American Civil Liberties Union
American Association of University Women
Peacefire
Waldo.Net
IN THIS SECTION
Study: Women lag in tech learning
The price of modern art
Native Americans get federal tech help
Yahoo! announces digital divide effort
Privacy study raises eyebrows, questions
Telecommuting: Getting talented employees
Telecommuting: Tech questions considered
MORE NEWS:
For more news, please visit our News Summary.